Just recently, I decided it was time to upgrade my dual desktop monitors. I’ve been running a pair of Dell 27″ monitors for over 8 years now. They’re identical 2707 WFP UltraSharp monitors, and turn ten years old this year. When I purchased the first member of that pair in 2007/2008, I paid over $700 to put it on my desk. When I purchased the second member of that pair, it set me back just almost $570 including shipping. In switching over to a pair of Dell Ultrasharp 2717 monitors this weekend, I paid just under $960 for both of them (less than $480 apiece) all told. My monitor upgrade saves on money and energy, and buys a lot more for less money. Let me explain…
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
2707 left, 2717 right
Why My Monitor Upgrade Saves on Money and Energy
It just goes to show that the relentless forward march of technology keeps delivering more bang for our bucks. The original monitors measured 25″ x 16.5″ with a nearly 1″ bezel all the way around. The new ones measure 23.75″ x under 14″ with a 5/8″ bezel. I see the same amount of screen real estate while gaining back some space on my desk. Even better, energy consumption is waaaay down. The 2707s consumed 125W at peak graphics load, while the 2717s only suck up 28W likewise. That’s a 77.6% reduction! Over time, that will make a huge difference. That’s because I routinely run my monitors 14 or more hours a day during the week, and at least 10 hours a day on weekends.
According to RapidTables Energy Consumption Calculator, the old monitors consumed around 60 kWh per month. But the new ones will come in under 14 kWh. At 10.2 cents per kWh from my provider, monthly cost drops from $6.12 to $1.37, for a savings of $4.75. Let’s assume I keep these monitors for 10 years like I did their predecessors. If so, I’ll have recovered over half their purchase price ($570) by the time the next generation takes over. Not enough to justify the outlay by itself, but not a bad dividend for an overdue upgrade.
But Wait … There’s More
The old monitors offered up 1980×1200 resolution, while the new ones deliver 2560×1440. The new monitors also offer a 5 ms response time, while the old ones clocked in at just slightly less (6 ms). The old ones included a built-in USB 2.0 hub and an SD card reader. The new ones drop the card reader, but offer 4 ports of USB 3.0 access instead. I also like the switch from VGA/DVI-D video ports to a single HDMI port, one mini-DisplayPort (DP), and three full-sized DP ports (2 in, 1 out, for daisy-chaining).
Hooking up the new monitors was also considerably easier, though Windows didn’t recognize the screens until I reinstalled the latest Nvidia driver (version 381.65). But that’s because I also installed an MSI Armor GeForce GTX 1070 to drive them. And although I already had 381.65 installed on that machine to drive the GTX 750 Ti already in place, Windows wasn’t happy until it was uninstalled and reinstalled on my production PC. Only then did it recognize the second monitor, and allow me to extend my desktop to encompass both together.
All in all, my monitor upgrade saves on money and energy, but also delivers higher resolution plus more and better connectivity options. A good deal, all the way around.