Without such integration, the console would be of little use and would have little chance of unseating established enterprise security products in a tight economy, IT managers said.
 |
||||
|
|
|||
|
||||
Microsoft also said it would ship a second beta of Stirling soon and a release candidate later this year.
Part of the original plan was to offer some integration with products from Symantec Corp. and McAfee Inc., mainly to serve as an all-in-one place to offer protection for Windows systems across the enterprise.
IT shops already have an array of security products, typically from more than one vendor. Usually each has to be managed separately. To that end, a unified console might be beneficial, said Ben Davis, a production systems engineer at Suburu of Indiana, a car manufacturing facility in Lafayette, Ind.
"Most consoles for individual products today are not that great, so I'd be curious to see it," Davis said. "But would you purchase it when you have other consoles? In today's economy it's a tougher sell."
Chris Mosby, a System Center Configuration Manager expert at a large, regional bank said he worried that Microsoft's entry into security management takes away from the company's focus on its core strengths, such as Windows management software.
"Microsoft has a habit of getting its fingers into everything," said Mosby, a Microsoft MVP.
"I wouldn't use Microsoft security just from having used its OneCare [antivirus utility]," he said. "It was so dumbed down."
Stirling would be useful if it supported third-party products, but using it for Microsoft-only software would be insufficient, he added.
Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation