One of the first decisions you need to make when implementing a patch management solution is agent vs. agent-less...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
distribution. To help you with the pros and cons of each we've put together this resource page where we will assemble bits of advice on agent vs. agent-less patch distribution.
First, an excerpt from Best practices for patch management:
Is it agent or agent-less distribution? There are two key issues to remember when looking at patch management deployment: agent or agent-less. An agent is when the patch management solution has a client side component. Any solution for this requires a deployment for the agent as well as the patches. The agent must be running in order for it to connect to the distribution server. Agent-less is when a server scans a network client by reading its registry remotely. This means you have to have a remote registry reading tool or some other method to administer the machine remotely.
Agent vs. Agent-less advice:
- Patch management expert Jason Chan discusses the complexity of agent-based distribution in this Ask-the-Experts response.
- Site expert Brian Posey relates a story on agent-based distribution in part 3 of this Step-by-step guide on Patch management must-dos.
Check back soon for a detailed look at the pros and cons of agent and agent-less patch distribution.