Problem solve Get help with specific problems with your technologies, process and projects.

Patch distribution with or without agents

To distribute patches with or without agents is a critical decision when implementing a patch management solution.

One of the first decisions you need to make when implementing a patch management solution is agent vs. agent-less distribution. To help you with the pros and cons of each we've put together this resource page where we will assemble bits of advice on agent vs. agent-less patch distribution.

First, an excerpt from Best practices for patch management:

Is it agent or agent-less distribution? There are two key issues to remember when looking at patch management deployment: agent or agent-less. An agent is when the patch management solution has a client side component. Any solution for this requires a deployment for the agent as well as the patches. The agent must be running in order for it to connect to the distribution server. Agent-less is when a server scans a network client by reading its registry remotely. This means you have to have a remote registry reading tool or some other method to administer the machine remotely.

Agent vs. Agent-less advice:

Check back soon for a detailed look at the pros and cons of agent and agent-less patch distribution.

This was last published in August 2005

Dig Deeper on Patches, alerts and critical updates

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.